Lawmakers Push Bill To Fund Wireless Health Research
RCR Wireless News
Journalist: By Jeffrey Silva
July 16, 2001
House and Senate lawmakers plan to introduce legislation after the August
recess that would provide federal funding for mobile-phone health research
and repeal a 1996 law prohibiting local officials from considering health as
a factor in reviewing tower-siting applications, a top Senate staffer said
last week.
The legislation comes as the mobile-phone industry faces increased
health-related litigation in courts across the country. Some lawsuits, such
as those in Maryland, Georgia, Nevada and California, claim cell phones
caused brain tumors. Class-action suits in various states allege industry
knew from the start of possible health risks from mobile phones and should
now supply consumers with hands-free headsets to reduce injury or compensate
those who have already paid for the radiation-protection accessory.
An Illinois state court last week rejected industry’s attempt to block a
partial settlement in a health-related privacy case, paving the way to
create a first-ever registry of subscribers who believe they’ve been injured
by mobile-phone radiation. The database will be managed by Dr. George Carlo,
the epidemiologist who headed a $28 million industry-funded research program
that found genetic damage from cell-phone radiation. Edward Barron, deputy
chief counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee, said another bill will be
offered to return full jurisdiction of broadcast antenna siting to state and
local authorities. Mobile-phone antennas are sometimes placed on broadcast
towers.
The three bills will be sponsored by Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and James
Jeffords (I-Vt.) and Reps. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) and Thomas Tancredo (R-Colo.).
The lawmakers hosted a congressional briefing last Thursday, hoping to drum
up additional support from colleagues.
Presentations were made by Barron, the
EMR Network and individual activists who want local control of antenna
siting and stronger federal oversight of health issues associated with
mobile-phone and base-station radiation exposure, Dr. Theodore Litovitz,
director of bioelectromagnetics research at Catholic University of America
and attorney Gerry Lederer. “This [excessive mobile-phone-radiation
exposure] enhances the probability of cancer,” said Litovitz.
Litovitz said recent research, some replicated, has documented non-heating,
adverse bioeffects from mobile-phone radiation and from electromagnetic
fields produced by power lines. Litovitz acknowledged some researchers do
not believe mobile phones or power lines cause non-thermal bioeffects. But
he said science is gravitating toward the non-thermal view. Federal
Communications Commission radiation guidelines for mobile phones and towers
do not take non-thermal radiation consequences into effect.“The standards
that protect you are based on the heating of tissue. … It’s an enormously
important issue,” said Litovitz. Litovitz has funding from millionaire
Baltimore lawyer Peter Angelos to study therapeutic applications of
radiofrequency radiation. Angelos is involved in brain cancer and headset
lawsuits against the mobile-phone industry.
The mobile-phone industry claims the preponderance of scientific studies say
cell phones are safe. The U.S. government is doing very little research,
though the National Toxicology Program recently announced it plans to spend
$10 million over the next five years on experiments that expose rodents to
mobile- phone radiation. FDA is working with the cellular industry on
limited studies, but that research has been criticized for possible conflict
of interest.
In the past, similar bills championed by the Vermont congressional
delegation have not gone far. The bills likely will be referred to the House
and Senate commerce committees. Barron said the bills’ sponsors plan to work
with Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ernest Hollings (D-S.C.). Sen. John
McCain (R-Ariz.) refused to consider previous health-antenna siting bills
when he headed the panel.
In the House, the Vermont bills will face an uphill battle in getting a
hearing from Commerce Committee Billy Tauzin (R-La.), who has championed
various pieces of mobile-phone industry legislation.